Benchmark analyses in minimally invasive esophagectomy — Impact on surgical quality improvement

6Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Over the last decades, benchmarking has become an established management tool to improve quality in commercial economics. It is a rather new concept in the healthcare industry, and a confusingly wide range of approaches referring to “benchmarking” have been employed in the field of minimally invasive esophageal cancer surgery. It is our conviction that benchmarking will be an essential element of surgical research in the future. Therefore, defining and implementing standards is not only a desirable, but a vital step. Recently, we have introduced a standardized method of establishing valid benchmarks for surgical quality improvement including ideal outcome thresholds for total minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy (ttMIE). The present article aims at discussing the actual literature on benchmarking in minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and at fueling the debate on how to further improve the current practice of surgical outcome research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Staiger, R. D., & Gutschow, C. A. (2019). Benchmark analyses in minimally invasive esophagectomy — Impact on surgical quality improvement. Journal of Thoracic Disease. AME Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.11.124

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free