The effect of poverty status and public housing residency on residential energy consumption in the u.s

3Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We use the U.S. Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS) for 2001 and 2005 to estimate household energy demand as a function of a composite energy price. We find a short-run price elasticity of -0.6 and a short-run income elasticity of 0.04 in the full sample, with poverty-level households having slightly higher price elasticities and lower income elasticities. Public housing residents use about 10% less energy than non-residents, a difference that persists despite a large set of household and dwelling controls and even with the analysis restricted to povertylevel households, multifamily housing occupants, and renters. Thus, the findings suggest that energy conservation measures undertaken by housing authorities have been effective at reducing energy consumption relative to similarly-situated households. Analysis by fuel type and use suggests that the relatively low energy use by public housing residents compared to other multifamily renters is driven by their lower use of natural gas for space heating, and electricity and natural gas for appliances.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ahmed, R., Stater, K. J., & Stater, M. (2013). The effect of poverty status and public housing residency on residential energy consumption in the u.s. Energy Studies Review, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.15173/esr.v20i1.542

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free