Motivations for naming: The development of a toponymic typology for Australian placenames

63Citations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

One of the main obstacles to having a meaningful discussion on, or analysis of, placenaming practices of a region or an era is the absence of an effective, consistent and standardized typology for toponym specifics. Surprisingly few attempts have been made to construct such a typology. Of those which have been developed, almost all show inconsistencies in their structure and include categories which are too wide or too narrow, which overlap with each other, or deal only with indigenous place names. In this paper, we review existing typologies and then propose a classification scheme for the Australian context based on the motivation for the naming of the feature in question. © American Name Society 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tent, J., & Blair, D. (2011). Motivations for naming: The development of a toponymic typology for Australian placenames. Names, 59(2), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1179/002777311X12976826704000

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free