Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in epithelial ovarian cancer: A comparison of type I and type II tumors

15Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in type I and type II epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC) and its associations with outcomes. Methods: Records of 132 women with EOC were reviewed. Immunostaining of PD-L1 was performed with formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens. Expression of PD-L1 was classified into four categories (0; 1+; 2+; 3+) according to intensity of expression. Expression of PD-L1 ≥2+ was deemed to be high. Results: Of the 132 women, 75 (56.8%) and 57 (43.2%) women had type I and type II tumors, respectively. Approximately 70% of cases exhibited high PD-L1 expression. There was no significant difference in the rate of high PD-L1 expression between the two EOC types (65.3% versus 59.6%). In type I tumors, high PD-L1 expression was associated with more advanced stages (51.0% versus 34.6%), greater recurrence (46.9% versus 26.9%), and shorter median progression-free survival (27 months versus 62 months) than low expression. In type II tumors, there were no apparent differences between high and low expression of PD-L1 in terms of the percentage of advanced-stage tumors (82.6% versus 79.4%), recurrence (56.5% versus 58.8%), and median progression-free survival (21 months versus 24 months). Conclusion: high PD-L1 expression is associated with worse oncological outcomes in type I EOC. This finding emphasizes the merit of further studies to confirm this promising result and to determine the potential role of PD-L1 blockade therapy in type I EOC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nhokaew, W., Kleebkaow, P., Chaisuriya, N., & Kietpeerakool, C. (2019). Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in epithelial ovarian cancer: A comparison of type I and type II tumors. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 20(4), 1161–1169. https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.4.1161

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free