Exoskeleton calcification in Norwegian populations of the crayfish Astacus astacus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Decapoda: Astacidae) varies with size, gender, and ambient calcium concentration

6Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Declining ambient calcium (Ca2+) concentrations in boreal, soft-water lakes of North America and Europe is one of many threats facing their biotic assemblages such as crayfish populations. We examined the specific exoskeleton calcium (Ca) concentration in Astacus astacus (Linnaeus, 1758) populations from a wide range of ambient Ca2+ concentrations to determine a possible correlation between the amount of Ca accumulated in their carapaces and the ambient Ca2+ concentrations. Exoskeleton Ca was the major constituent of the crayfish A. astacus carapaces in this survey (21.2 to 25.8% Ca of dry weight (DW)), whereas magnesium (Mg) displayed a disproportionately low constituent. The strong correlation between mineral contents of dry weight (DW) and ash weight (AW) (r=0.98) allowed us to refer mineral contents consequently to DW. A linear model using gender, length and ambient Ca2+ concentration (log transformed) explained 82% of the variation in carapace Ca content (as % DW). Astacus astacus females were slightly more calcified than males (0.4% of DW, when adjusted for ambient Ca2+ and body length). Large-bodied populations were slightly, but significantly more heavily calcified than those with smaller bodies: carapace Ca content increased by 0.2% DW for each cm increase in body length. The strong logarithmic effect of ambient Ca2+ implies that carapace Ca content increases by 1.7 × log(2) = 1.2% DW for every doubling of the Ca2+ concentration in the water.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wærvågen, S. B., Andersen, T., & Taugbøl, T. (2016). Exoskeleton calcification in Norwegian populations of the crayfish Astacus astacus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Decapoda: Astacidae) varies with size, gender, and ambient calcium concentration. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 36(2), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1163/1937240X-00002406

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free