Assessment of 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET Accuracy in Localizing Recurrent Prostate Cancer

  • Fendler W
  • Calais J
  • Eiber M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Importance: In retrospective studies, 68Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission tomographic (PET) imaging improves detection of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer compared with conventional imaging. Objective: To assess 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET accuracy in a prospective multicenter trial. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this single-arm prospective trial conducted at University of California, San Francisco and University of California, Los Angeles, 635 patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after prostatectomy (n = 262, 41%), radiation therapy (n = 169, 27%), or both (n = 204, 32%) underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET. Presence of prostate cancer was recorded by 3 blinded readers on a per-patient and per-region base. Lesions were validated by histopathologic analysis and a composite reference standard. Main Outcomes and Measures: Endpoints were positive predictive value (PPV), detection rate, interreader reproducibility, and safety. Results: A total of 635 men were enrolled with a median age of 69 years (range, 44-95 years). On a per-patient basis, PPV was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.75-0.90) by histopathologic validation (primary endpoint, n = 87) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.88-0.95) by the composite reference standard (n = 217). 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET localized recurrent prostate cancer in 475 of 635 (75%) patients; detection rates significantly increased with prostate-specific antigen (PSA): 38% for <0.5 ng/mL (n = 136), 57% for 0.5 to <1.0 ng/mL (n = 79), 84% for 1.0 to <2.0 ng/mL (n = 89), 86% for 2.0 to <5.0 ng/mL (n = 158), and 97% for ≥5.0 ng/mL (n = 173, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fendler, W. P., Calais, J., Eiber, M., Flavell, R. R., Mishoe, A., Feng, F. Y., … Hope, T. A. (2019). Assessment of 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET Accuracy in Localizing Recurrent Prostate Cancer. JAMA Oncology, 5(6), 856. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0096

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free