Physics Envy: Psychologists’ Perceptions of Psychology and Agreement About Core Concepts

20Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study assessed the nature of psychology and its consensus regarding core content. We hypothesized that psychology possesses little agreement regarding its core content areas and thus may “envy” more canonical sciences, such as physics. Using a global sample, we compared psychologists’ and physicists’ perceptions regarding the nature of their field and consensus of core content areas within their respective disciplines. Results revealed that psychologists perceive their field as less theoretically and empirically grounded, and its major findings less agreed upon than physics. Psychologists also generated little consensus regarding its most important, core content areas. Discussion focuses on the importance of psychology establishing a core knowledge base and strategies to overcome “physics envy” in the classroom. © 2014, SAGE Publications. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Howell, J. L., Collisson, B., & King, K. M. (2014). Physics Envy: Psychologistsâ€TM Perceptions of Psychology and Agreement About Core Concepts. Teaching of Psychology, 41(4), 330–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628314549705

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free