Best pasture management practice adoption and sediment abatement

8Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Research on producer willingness to adopt individual best pasture management practices (BMPs) is extensive, but less attention has been paid to producers simultaneously adopting multiple, complementary BMPs. Applications linking primary survey data on BMP adoption to water quality biophysical models are also limited. A choice-experiment survey of livestock producers is analyzed to determine willingness to adopt pasture BMPs. Sediment abatement curves are derived by linking estimates of producer responsiveness to incentives to adopt rotational grazing with a biophysical simulation model. Current cost share rates of $24/acre should yield a 12% decrease in sediment loading from pastures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lambert, D. M., Clark, C. D., Medwid, L. J., Hawkins, S. A., & McClellan, H. A. (2020). Best pasture management practice adoption and sediment abatement. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 52(2), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.1017/aae.2019.42

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free