Evaluation of correlations between frequencies of complete denture relines and serum levels of 3 bone metabolic markers: A cross-sectional pilot study

5Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Statement of problem Continuous bone resorption is the primary reason for complete denture relines. Because resorption rates vary, the frequency at which individuals require relines also varies. Currently, there are no predictors to identify individuals at risk of frequent relines or to guide clinicians in decisions related to relines. Purpose The purpose of this cross-sectional pilot study was to determine the utility of measuring bone metabolic markers (C-terminal telopeptide, osteocalcin, 25-OH hydroxy vitamin D) to predict the frequency of complete denture relines. Material and methods One hundred adult participants with complete dentures (either maxillary, mandibular, or both) participated in 1 dental clinic visit involving a dental examination and brief interview to obtain relevant medical and dental history, information on medication/supplement use, and 1 laboratory blood draw for the measurement of bone metabolic markers. Data were analyzed by using the Pearson correlation, independent Student t test, or analysis of variance (α=.05). Results Significant correlations were found between the frequency of relines and C-telopeptide and osteocalcin levels but not with vitamin D or age. No significant associations with reline frequency and other factors (sex, ethnicity, presence or absence of diabetes, use of calcium and vitamin D supplements) were observed. Conclusions Elevated levels of bone turnover markers in individuals with edentulism were associated with increased frequency of denture relines.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Puri, S., Kattadiyil, M. T., Puri, N., & Hall, S. L. (2016). Evaluation of correlations between frequencies of complete denture relines and serum levels of 3 bone metabolic markers: A cross-sectional pilot study. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 116(6), 867–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free