Comparing Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Models: A Review of the Literature

40Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

There are currently 2 approved residency training models in the United States conferring eligibility for the American Board of Plastic Surgery examination - the integrated pathway and the independent pathway. While both pathways allow for board certification, there has been much debate regarding the effectiveness of one training model over the other. In this article, we review the existing literature to compare these pathways with regard to quality of trainees, proficiency of graduates, and practice or career outcomes. Ongoing studies are strongly encouraged to continue to identify areas of improvement for both types of training programs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bhadkamkar, M. A., Luu, B. C., Davis, M. J., Reece, E. M., Chu, C. K., Buchanan, E. P., & Winocour, S. (2020). Comparing Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Models: A Review of the Literature. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002897

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free