Influence of wine-related physicochemical factors on the growth and metabolism of non-Saccharomyces and Saccharomyces yeasts in mixed culture

30Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The influence of two physicochemical factors involved in winemaking, temperature and SO2, on the kinetics and metabolic behavior of Kloeckera apiculata and Saccharomyces cerevisiae was examined. Highest biomass was reached at 15 and 25°C for K. apiculata and S. cerevisiae, respectively. Pure cultures of K. apiculata died off early with increasing temperature, but in co-culture with S. cerevisiae it showed higher viability and a change in the death curve from exponential to linear. Statistical analysis revealed that metabolite production was significantly different for the three cultures and also at the different fermentation temperatures. Besides, the interaction between culture type and temperature was significant. At temperatures from 15 to 30°C the mixed culture showed similar ethanol and lower acetic acid production compared with a pure culture of K. apiculata. SO2 addition slightly increased survival of the non-Saccharomyces species in pure and mixed cultures. Statistical evaluation indicated that culture type and SO2 addition significantly affected metabolite production, but the interaction between culture and SO2 was not significant. These results contribute to current knowledge of enological factors and their effect on prevalence and fermentative activities of the composite yeast flora and the statistical significance emphasizes the importance of the combined influence of the culture type and physicochemical factors on the production of fermentation metabolites. © Society for Industrial Microbiology 2008.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mendoza, L. M., De Nadra, M. C. M., Bru, E., & Farías, M. E. (2009). Influence of wine-related physicochemical factors on the growth and metabolism of non-Saccharomyces and Saccharomyces yeasts in mixed culture. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 36(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-008-0489-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free