Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution (review)

  • Bouchard D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The goal of this study is to reintegrate the theory of generative grammar into the cognitive sciences. Generative grammar was right to focus on the child’s acquisition of language as its central problem, leading to the hypothesis of an innate Universal Grammar. However, generative grammar was mistaken in assuming that the syntactic component is the sole course of combinatoriality, and that everything else is “interpretive.” The proper approach is a parallel architecture, in which phonology, syntax, and semantics are au- tonomous generative systems linked by interface components. The parallel architecture leads to an integration within linguistics, and to a far better integration with the rest of cognitive neuroscience. It fits naturally into the larger architecture of the mind/brain and per- mits a properly mentalistic theory of semantics. It results in a view of linguistic performance in which the rules of grammar are directly involved in processing. Finally, it leads to a natural account of the incremental evolution of the language capacity

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bouchard, D. (2003). Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution (review). The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, 48(1), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1353/cjl.2004.0003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free