Laboratory evaluation of dimethyl phthalate against Anopheles stephensi and Culex pipiens

6Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Two repellents includes Iranian and Merck dimethyl phthalate (DMP) were evaluated against Anopheles stephensi and Culex pipiens, using American Society for Testing and Material (ASTM) standard ED 951-83 procedure, a free choice method based on the variable dose-fixed time. Also a modified of ASTM method we used for determination of effective dosages of the repellents. In ASTM method there were no significant differences between the two repellents (Iranian and Merck's DMP) as indicated by the ED50 and ED95 values (p>0.05). But, there were significant differences in repellent sensitivity between An. stephensi and Cx. pipiens at the ED95 level. In modified ASTM method there were no significant differences between the two repellents against An. stephensi, as indicated by the ED50 values (p>0.05). But, there are significant differences between the two repellents against Cx. pipence based on ED50 value. Results of this study showed that the Iranian synthesized DMP has necessary potential and specificity to compare with Merck manufactured product. © 2007 Asian Network for Scientific Information.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khoobdel, M., Oshaghi, M. A., Jonaidi, N., Shayeghi, M., Abaei, M. R., Panahi, Y., … Saeedfar, H. (2007). Laboratory evaluation of dimethyl phthalate against Anopheles stephensi and Culex pipiens. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 10(5), 745–750. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2007.745.750

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free