Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to compare patients with PHC with lymph node metastases (LN+) who underwent a resection with patients who did not undergo resection because of locally advanced disease at exploratory laparotomy. Methods Consecutive LN+ patients who underwent a resection for PHC in 12 centers were compared with patients who did not undergo resection because of locally advanced disease at exploratory laparotomy in 2 centers. Results In the resected cohort of 119 patients, the median overall survival (OS) was 19 months and the estimated 1-, 3- and 5-year OS was 69%, 27% and 13%, respectively. In the non-resected cohort of 113 patients, median OS was 12 months and the estimated 1-, 3- and 5-year OS was 49%, 7%, and 3%, respectively. OS was better in the resected LN+ cohort (p < 0.001). Positive resection margin (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.54; 95%CI: 0.97–2.45) and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (HR: 1.71; 95%CI: 1.09–2.69) were independent poor prognostic factors in the resected cohort. Conclusion Patients with PHC who underwent a resection for LN+ disease had better OS than patients who did not undergo resection because of locally advanced disease at exploratory laparotomy. LN+ PHC does not preclude 5-year survival after resection.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Buettner, S., van Vugt, J. L. A., Gaspersz, M. P., Coelen, R. J. S., Roos, E., Labeur, T. A., … Groot Koerkamp, B. (2017). Survival after resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in patients with lymph node metastases. HPB, 19(8), 735–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2017.04.014
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.