Abstract
Objectives: To quantify differences in waste and cost of disposable equipment between different tonsillectomy techniques. Methods: Prospective study of waste attributable to disposable waste produced by tonsillectomy surgery. Disposable equipment required for tonsillectomy using cold, monopolar electrocautery (ME), and coblation techniques was measured; and differences in mass, volume, and cost of equipment between the 3 techniques were quantified. Results: Cold technique was found to produce the least waste and have the lowest cost attributable to disposable surgical equipment. Projected single-case savings in mass and volume of waste resulting from using cold technique compared to ME were 1.272 kg and 1.013 L, respectively, and 1.043 kg and 1.723 L compared to coblation. Projected single-case savings in cost of disposable equipment for cold technique compared to ME were US$9.35 and US$185.05 compared to coblation. Discussion: Using cold technique for adult tonsillectomy reduces waste and cost of disposable equipment compared to ME and coblation. Implications for Practice: Surgeons desiring to reduce cost and waste associated with tonsillectomy surgery may consider transitioning to cold technique.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Meiklejohn, D. A., & Chavarri, V. M. (2021). Cold Technique in Adult Tonsillectomy Reduces Waste and Cost. Ear, Nose and Throat Journal, 100(5_suppl), 427S-430S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145561319882779
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.