To Touch or to Talk: Individual Preferences, Trust and Empathy in Comforting Behaviours

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Social touch has the power to alleviate physical pain and emotional distress. Here we ask whether touch is perceived as more effective than words in comforting interactions, and whether its effects are influenced by interaction dynamics, individual preferences for touch, propensity to trust, and trait empathy. Across two studies, participants (n = 199) were exposed to comics depicting comforting interactions between two friends, one experiencing emotional distress and the other providing comfort either verbally or through touch. Results suggest that the comforter's trustworthiness and the interaction positivity increase when the comforting modality matches the one that observers would likely use in their friendships. Tactile interactions and observers' high trait empathy enhance emotional empathy. Social touch therefore emerges as especially impactful in eliciting empathy, yet it may also carry the risk of enhancing personal distress for comforters. Please refer to the Supporting Information section to find this article's community and social impact statement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Valori, I., Fan, Y., Jung, M. M., Shamay-Tsoory, S., & Fairhurst, M. T. (2026). To Touch or to Talk: Individual Preferences, Trust and Empathy in Comforting Behaviours. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.70216

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free