Defining discordance in twin studies of risk and protective factors for late life disorders

8Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In studies that employ matched pair analysis to identify environmental exposures important for a disorder, criteria for discordant pairs are seldom discussed. Yet several assumptions concerning the definition of discordancy may have considerable influence over what results are found. Problems are exacerbated when age of onset for a disorder is late in life. We propose a new set of criteria for defining discordant pairs in studies of dementia, taking into account duration of discordance and competing causes of mortality, and evaluate the consequences of choosing alternative definitions of discordancy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gatz, M., Pedersen, N. L., Crowe, M., & Fiske, A. (2000). Defining discordance in twin studies of risk and protective factors for late life disorders. Twin Research, 3(3), 159–164. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.3.3.159

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free