Mapping Orchard Trees from UAV Imagery Through One Growing Season: A Comparison Between OBIA-Based and Three CNN-Based Object Detection Methods

9Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Extracting the shapes of individual tree crowns from high-resolution imagery can play a crucial role in many applications, including precision agriculture. We evaluated three CNN models—MASK R-CNN, YOLOv3, and SAM—and compared their tree crown results with OBIA-based reference datasets from UAV imagery for seven dates across one growing season. We found that YOLOv3 performed poorly across all dates; both MASK R-CNN and SAM performed well in May, June, September, and November (precision, recall, and F1 scores over 0.79). All models struggled in the early season imagery (e.g., March). MASK R-CNN outperformed other models in August (when there was smoke haze) and December (showing end-of-season variation in leaf color). SAM was the fastest model, and, as it required no training, it could cover more area in less time; MASK R-CNN was very accurate and customizable. In this paper, we aimed to contribute insight into which CNN model offers the best balance of accuracy and ease of implementation for orchard management tasks. We also evaluated its applicability within one software ecosystem, ESRI ArcGIS Pro, and showed how such an approach offers users a streamlined efficient way to detect objects in high-resolution UAV imagery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kelly, M., Feirer, S., Hogan, S., Lyons, A., Lin, F., & Jacygrad, E. (2025). Mapping Orchard Trees from UAV Imagery Through One Growing Season: A Comparison Between OBIA-Based and Three CNN-Based Object Detection Methods. Drones, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9090593

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free