Branching out or inwards? The logic of fractals in Russian studies

16Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This essay reflects upon the consequences of Russia’s war against Ukraine on the sub-field of Russian studies in political science. I argue that the war has exposed some blind spots in our knowledge. Notably, it has left us struggling to understand the historically deprived communities in Russia whose values, sentiments, and vulnerabilities may be indirect buttresses to both support for Putin and the war. I discuss two key issues in the sub-field: (1) the elite-centered approaches in research in mainstream work on Russia, not least due to data availability preoccupations; and (2) the paucity of inter-disciplinary perspectives, particularly the reluctance of mainstream studies to cast their nets into history and sociology. Disciplinary pressures–the credibility revolution–complicate a historically sensitive revision of long-internalized assumptions. I draw on my recent work on the historical underpinnings of social structure and its implications for civil society, protest, and support for democracy in Russia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lankina, T. (2023). Branching out or inwards? The logic of fractals in Russian studies. Post-Soviet Affairs, 39(1–2), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2022.2147382

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free