Does the presence of siblings affect the results produced by a surveillance system of child mistreatment? Comparisons of several commonly-used statistical methods Public Health

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Over time, the circumstances encountered in case of child mistreatment, can be quite complex and then, can lead to methodological questions for the analysis of the data. Based on data coming from 395 children hospitalized, alone (66.1 %) or in siblings (33.9 %), in a pediatric ward between 2007 and 2012 for mistreatment or because of a severe risk of mistreatment, the aims of this paper were to quantify the degree of similarity between sibling members, to study the differences between children hospitalized alone or with siblings and to compare four statistical methods (logistic regression and GEE, both without and with robust standard error) for the analyses of the associated factors of mistreatment. Results: Almost all intracluster correlation coefficients were large, meaning that the sibling's members have a higher degree of similarity between them. The odds ratios were not exactly the same between the two models and the robust standard errors where almost always higher than the model-based standard errors in both logistic and GEE models leading to wider confidence intervals. Conclusion: Because many of the intra-siblings correlations observed were relatively strong, the failure to take this cluster dependency into account had a substantial effect on the statistical analyses. Methods taking into account the cluster dependency are widely available in statistical software and strongly recommended.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Senterre, C., Levêque, A., Vanthournout, B., & Dramaix, M. (2015). Does the presence of siblings affect the results produced by a surveillance system of child mistreatment? Comparisons of several commonly-used statistical methods Public Health. BMC Research Notes, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1710-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free