Healthcare Resource Utilization in Refractory MACLD: Comparison of an Amikacin Liposome Inhalation Suspension (ALIS) Cohort with a Non-ALIS Cohort

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Add-on treatment with amikacin liposome inhalation suspension (ALIS) to a multidrug antibiotic regimen is the only US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for adults with refractory Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease (MACLD). In real-world settings, other antibiotics may be added on to treat refractory MACLD. We analyzed healthcare resource utilization in a US patient population who received add-on treatment for refractory MACLD. Methods: This was a retrospective claims analysis using Merative™ MarketScan® databases (January 2016 to December 2022). Two patient cohorts were defined: an ALIS and non-ALIS cohort. Index date was date of first prescription with ALIS or non-ALIS antibiotic for refractory MACLD. Hospitalizations (all-cause, respiratory-related, nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM)-related) and emergency room (ER) visits at 0–6-month and 7–12-month post-index periods were compared with baseline (6-month pre-index period) per cohort. Multivariate logistic regression models compared the odds of hospitalizations or ER visits between cohorts. Results: The ALIS and non-ALIS cohorts comprised 116 and 63 patients, respectively. The most common add-on treatments for refractory MACLD in the non-ALIS cohort were parenteral amikacin (41.3%) and moxifloxacin (27.0%). In the ALIS cohort, significant reductions from baseline, as compared with the 7–12-month post-index period, were observed in all-cause (12.1% vs 22.4%), respiratory-related (8.6% vs 20.7%), and NTM-related hospitalizations (9.5% vs 19.8%) (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). There were no significant changes from baseline in hospitalizations at follow-up in the non-ALIS cohort. No significant changes from baseline in ER visits or hospital length of stay were observed in either cohort. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of all-cause (OR [95% confidence interval, CI] 0.45 [0.21–0.96]) and respiratory-related hospitalizations (OR 0.44 [0.21–0.96]) were statistically significantly lower in the ALIS cohort compared with the non-ALIS cohort. Conclusions: Add-on treatment with ALIS in refractory MACLD may lead to reductions in hospitalizations over time and lower odds of hospitalizations compared with add-on treatment with non-ALIS antibiotics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aksamit, T. R., Waweru, C., Welch, E., Divinagracia, E., Wang, P., & Markson, L. (2025). Healthcare Resource Utilization in Refractory MACLD: Comparison of an Amikacin Liposome Inhalation Suspension (ALIS) Cohort with a Non-ALIS Cohort. Pulmonary Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41030-025-00324-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free