Persistent Doubt: An Examination of Hedge Fund Performance

4Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We examine whether performance persistence is suspicious. Top quintile portfolios formed on the Sharpe ratio, alpha, and information ratio persistently outperform similarly constructed mediocre third quintile portfolios throughout our sample period, but performance is more modest and less persistent when portfolios are formed on the excess manipulation-proof performance measure (EMPPM). By selecting funds formed on ranking by Sharpe and information ratios, investors also select funds that have persistently doubtful performance according to the doubt ratio. In contrast, portfolios formed on alphas and especially the EMPPM have much less excess and persistent doubt.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

dela O. González, M., Papageorgiou, N. A., & Skinner, F. S. (2016). Persistent Doubt: An Examination of Hedge Fund Performance. European Financial Management, 22(4), 613–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12070

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free