Rorty and the Ethos of the Pragmatic Community: Replies

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this essay I respond to four commen-tators who participated in a symposium on my book, Reconstructing Pragmatism. Issues that emerge include: Addams’s and Rorty’s mutual commitment to cultivating affective rationality; how Royce and Rorty share an ethical imperative in their philosophy and where both can learn from Alain Locke; what a post-Rortyan pragmatism might look like and the best path toward realizing it; the significance of recovering the serious, unironic Rorty and the lim-its of weak misreadings; Rorty’s pragmatic maxim; and reflections on how best to sus-tain the habits and practices of a robust pragmatic tradition and community. In places, for understandable reasons the com-mentaries stray from the book’s argument about Rorty’s relation to classical pragmatism and address larger issues surrounding Rorty’s work and its broader reception. I don’t respond to all such matters but try to here and there, which hopefully gives what follows a relevance for contemporary pragmatism beyond the book itself.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Voparil, C. (2022). Rorty and the Ethos of the Pragmatic Community: Replies. Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society, 58(4), 352–384. https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.58.4.07

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free