Establishing raw acceleration thresholds to classify sedentary and stationary behaviour in children

38Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study aimed to: (1) compare acceleration output between ActiGraph (AG) hip and wrist monitors and GENEActiv (GA) wrist monitors; (2) identify raw acceleration sedentary and stationary thresholds for the two brands and placements; and (3) validate the thresholds during a free-living period. Twenty-seven from 9-to 10-year-old children wore AG accelerometers on the right hip, dominant-and non-dominant wrists, GA accelerometers on both wrists, and an activPAL on the thigh, while completing seven sedentary and light-intensity physical activities, followed by 10 min of school recess. In a subsequent study, 21 children wore AG and GA wrist monitors and activPAL for two days of free-living. The main effects of activity and brand and a significant activity × brand × placement interaction were observed (all p < 0.0001). Output from the AG hip was lower than the AG wrist monitors (both p < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves established AG sedentary thresholds of 32.6 mg for the hip, 55.6 mg and 48.1 mg for dominant and non-dominant wrists respectively. GA wrist thresholds were 56.5 mg (dominant) and 51.6 mg (non-dominant). Similar thresholds were observed for stationary behaviours. The AG non-dominant threshold came closest to achieving equivalency with activPAL during free-living.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hurter, L., Fairclough, S. J., Knowles, Z. R., Porcellato, L. A., Cooper-Ryan, A. M., & Boddy, L. M. (2018). Establishing raw acceleration thresholds to classify sedentary and stationary behaviour in children. Children, 5(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/children5120172

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free