Post-operative morbidity ensuing surgery for insular gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

36Citations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The surgical resection of insular gliomas remains a challenge. Middle cerebral artery perforating arteries and deep functional pathways affect the extent of resection and the rate of post-operative morbidity. The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature examining early and permanent post-operative deficits in patients who underwent resection of insular gliomas using awake craniotomy with direct electrical stimulation (DES) versus surgery under general anesthesia. A systematic search of three databases was performed for studies published between 1990 and 2018. Random-effect meta-analysis was used to pool the rate of early and permanent post-operative deficits. Random-effect meta-regression was used to examine the association between the rate of post-operative deficit and the anesthesia protocol. We included eight studies evaluating 227 patients with insular glioma. The rate of permanent sequelae was lower after awake craniotomy with DES (3.5% vs 15.7%; P =.001), and early deficits were lower after surgery under general anesthesia (27.3% vs 47.7%; P =.04). Awake surgery was significantly more common among patients with tumor located within the dominant hemisphere (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Di Carlo, D. T., Cagnazzo, F., Anania, Y., Duffau, H., Benedetto, N., Morganti, R., & Perrini, P. (2020, June 1). Post-operative morbidity ensuing surgery for insular gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgical Review. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-019-01113-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free