Ethnic and socioeconomic differences in variability in nutritional biomarkers

20Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Several studies have reported ethnic, education, and income differentials in concentrations of selected nutritional biomarkers in the US population. Although biomarker measurements are not subject to biased self-reports, biologic variability due to individual characteristics and behaviors related to dietary exposures contributes to within-subject variability and measurement error. Objective: We aimed to establish whether the magnitude of components of variance for nutritional biomarkers also differs in these high-risk groups. Design: We used data from 2 replicate measurements of serum concentrations of vitamins A, C, D, and E; folate; carotenoids; ferritin; and selenium in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey second examination subsample (n = 948) to examine the within-subject and between-subject components of variance. We used multivariate regression methods with log-transformed analyte concentrations as outcomes to estimate the ratios of the withinsubject to between-subject components of variance by categories of ethnicity, income, and education. Results: In non-Hispanic blacks, the within-subject to betweensubject variance ratio for α-cryptoxanthin concentration was higher (0.23; 95% CI: 0.17, 0.29) relative to non-Hispanic whites (0.13; 0.11, 0.16) and Mexican Americans (0.11; 0.07, 0.14), and the lutein + zeaxanthin ratio was higher (0.29; 0.21, 0.38) relative to Mexican Americans (0.15; 0.10, 0.19). Higher income was associated with larger within-subject to between-subject variance ratios for serum vitamin C and red blood cell folate concentrations but smaller ratios for serum vitamin A. Overall, there were few consistent up- or down-trends in the direction of covariate-adjusted variability by ethnicity, income, or education. Conclusion: Population groups at high risk of adverse nutritional profiles did not have larger variance ratios for most of the examined biomarkers. © 2008 American Society for Nutrition.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kant, A. K., & Graubard, B. I. (2008). Ethnic and socioeconomic differences in variability in nutritional biomarkers. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 87(5), 1464–1471. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/87.5.1464

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free