Patient characteristics and clinical course of covid‐19 patients treated at a german tertiary center during the first and second waves in the year 2020

22Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this study, we directly compared coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) patients hospitalized during the first (27 February–28 July 2020) and second (29 July–31 December 2020) wave of the pandemic at a large tertiary center in northern Germany. Patients who presented during the first (n = 174) and second (n = 331) wave did not differ in age (median [IQR], 59 years [46, 71] vs. 58 years [42, 73]; p = 0.82) or age‐adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (median [IQR], 2 [1, 4] vs. 2 [0, 4]; p = 0.50). During the second wave, a higher proportion of patients were treated as outpatients (11% [n = 20] vs. 20% [n = 67]), fewer patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (43% [n = 75] vs. 29% [n = 96]), and duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter (median days [IQR], 14 [8, 34] vs. 11 [5, 19]; p < 0.001). However, in‐hospital mortality was high throughout the pandemic and did not differ between the two periods (16% [n = 27] vs. 16% [n = 54]; p = 0.89). While novel treatment strategies and increased knowledge about the clinical management of COVID‐19 may have resulted in a less severe disease course in some patients, in‐hospital mortality remained unaltered at a high level. These findings highlight the unabated need for efforts to hamper severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) transmission, to increase vaccination coverage, and to develop novel treatment strategies to prevent mortality and decrease morbidity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brehm, T. T., Heyer, A., Roedl, K., Jarczak, D., Nierhaus, A., Nentwich, M. F., … Wiesch, J. S. Z. (2021). Patient characteristics and clinical course of covid‐19 patients treated at a german tertiary center during the first and second waves in the year 2020. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112274

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free