Derechos en el final de la vida: El rechazo de tratamientos médicos en los tribunales argentinos

4Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper addresses the judicialization of end of life medical decisionmaking, as part of the advance of the justice system in the regulation of medical practice and the rise of recognition of patient autonomy. The article analyzes, from a sociological standpoint, legal decisions regarding treatment refusal at the end of life produced by the Argentine courts between 1975 and 2015. Based on a qualitative design, 38 sentences collected from jurisprudential databases using key terms were analyzed. First, judicialized cases during the period are described; these are characterized by a high proportion of claims presented by health institutions, a pro-treatment bias in the legal actions requested, and a high percentage of unnecessary litigation in the absence of conflicts or in situations that do not require court intervention. Second, legal and extralegal factors affecting the justiciability of decisions to refuse or withdraw medical treatments, such as changes in the law and processes of politicization of claims, are analyzed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alonso, J. P. (2016). Derechos en el final de la vida: El rechazo de tratamientos médicos en los tribunales argentinos. Salud Colectiva, 12(3), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.18294/sc.2016.989

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free