The silent framers of British North American Union: The colonial office and Canadian confederation, 1851-67

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

One hundred and fifty years after the creation of the "Dominion" of Canada, it is notable that historians have often downplayed the role of the British Colonial Office in initiating and guiding the process that brought about the union of the colonies of British North America. In the traditional narrative, the British government and Colonial Office were forced to accept the Quebec Resolutions drafted by North American representatives as a fait accompli. This view tends to exaggerate the importance of Confederation as a singular constitutional event, and it does not take into account the active pursuit, by numerous colonial administrators over the course of the years prior to Confederation, to organize some form of union of the British North American colonies and the considerable influence they exercised over the nature of the union created in 1867. This article examines the intentions of the various British colonial administrators and their visions for a federal or legislative model for the governance of the new Dominion. It argues that while the Colonial Office heavily favoured a strong legislative union, the British North America Act of 1867 was ultimately a product of compromise resulting in the strong ambiguities that gave rise to the later notion of a "compact theory." These ambiguities were further reflected in the innovative designation of "Dominion" to the newly united provinces; however, this article warns that it is crucial that scholars are wary of anachronistically imposing Canada's eventual quasi-independent Dominion status upon the circumstances of 1867.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gilding, B. (2018, September 1). The silent framers of British North American Union: The colonial office and Canadian confederation, 1851-67. Canadian Historical Review. University of Toronto Press Inc. https://doi.org/10.3138/chr.2017-0053

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free