Your reserves may be best estimate, but are they valid?

1Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper outlines frameworks to use for reserving validation and gives the reader an overview of current techniques being employed. In the experience of the authors, many companies lack an embedded reserve validation framework and reserve validation can appear piecemeal and unstructured. The paper outlines a case study demonstrating how successful machine learning techniques will become and then goes on to discuss the implications of machine learning to the future of reserving departments, processes, data and validation techniques. Reserving validation can take many forms, from simple checks to full independent reviews to add value to the reserving process, enhance governance and increase confidence in and reliability in results. This paper discusses covers common weaknesses and their solutions and suggestions of a framework in which to apply validation tools. The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on reserving validation is also covered as are early warning indicators and the topic of IFRS 17 from the standpoint of reserving validation. The paper looks at the future for reserving validation and discusses the data challenges that need overcoming on the path to embedded reserving process validation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Diffey, W., Hobern, L., Lauder, A., Cleugh, M., Wu, M., Mukherjee, S., … Harrison, E. (2022, January 20). Your reserves may be best estimate, but are they valid? British Actuarial Journal. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357321721000179

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free