Comparison of traditional six-year and new four-year dental curricula in South Korea.

3Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the dental curriculum of the traditional six-year system with that of the new four-year (graduate-entry) system in South Korea. There are 11 dental schools in South Korea: six are public and five are private. Eight offer the new four-year program and the other three offer the traditional six-year program. Descriptive analyses were conducted using bibliographic data and local information along with statistical analyses such as chi-square tests. In the six-year programs, clinical dentistry subjects were taught almost equally in practical and didactic courses, while the basic science courses were taught more often as practical courses (P < 0.0001). In the four-year programs, both the basic science and clinical dentistry subjects were taught didactically more often; while more dentistry subjects were taught than basic sciences (P = 0.004). The four-year program model in South Korea is more focused on dentistry than on basic science, while both basic and clinical dentistry subjects were equally taught in the six-year program.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Komabayashi, T., Ahn, C., Kim, K. J., & Oh, H. W. (2012). Comparison of traditional six-year and new four-year dental curricula in South Korea. Journal of Oral Science, 54(2), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.54.191

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free