A Comparison between the Morphologies and Structures of Dwarf Galaxies with and without Active Massive Black Holes

  • Kimbrell S
  • Reines A
  • Greene J
  • et al.
5Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We study the morphologies and structures of 57 dwarf galaxies that are representative of the general population of dwarf galaxies and compare their demographics to a sample of dwarf galaxies hosting optically selected active galactic nuclei (AGNs). The two samples span the same galaxy stellar mass (10 9 ≲ M ⋆ / M ⊙ ≲ 10 9.5 ) and color range, and the observations are well-matched in physical resolution. The fractions of irregular galaxies (14%) and early types/ellipticals (∼18%) are nearly identical among the two samples. However, among galaxies with disks (the majority of each sample), the AGN hosts almost always have a detectable (pseudo)bulge, while a large fraction of the non-AGN hosts are pure disk galaxies with no detectable (pseudo)bulge. Central point sources of light consistent with nuclear star clusters are detected in many of the non-AGN hosts. In contrast, central point sources detected in the AGN hosts are, on average, more than 2 orders of magnitude more luminous, suggesting the point sources in these objects are dominated by AGN light. The preference for (pseudo)bulges in dwarf AGN hosts may inform searches for massive black holes in dwarf galaxies and attempts to constrain the black hole occupation fraction, which, in turn, has implications for our understanding of black hole seeding mechanisms.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kimbrell, S. J., Reines, A. E., Greene, J. E., & Geha, M. (2023). A Comparison between the Morphologies and Structures of Dwarf Galaxies with and without Active Massive Black Holes. The Astrophysical Journal, 958(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acf762

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free