Evidence-Informed Policy-Making: Are We Doing Enough? Comment on “Examining and Contextualizing Approaches to Establish Policy Support Organizations – A Mixed Method Study”

8Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In their study of manifestations of policy support organizations (PSOs), Al Sabahi et al found that PSOs are united in their goal to support evidence-informed policy-making (EIPM), albeit with differing approaches. Their article is an important contribution to the body of research on evidence utilization and implementation. The unprecedented evidence climate presented by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) provides a unique window to motivate EIPM implementation. Research such as Al Sabahi and colleagues must prompt a dialogue regarding how best to address some of the current shortcomings in the field of EIPM. Monitoring and evaluation of best practices in EIPM is scarce. EIPM uptake is unsatisfactory, and the scientific community needs to ask itself why that is and what can be done. And, we should strive to develop a gradient that discerns between the convenient and the essential so countries can evaluate and pursue the policies to best address their greatest pain points through evidence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ellen, M. E., & Ben-Sheleg, E. (2022, September 1). Evidence-Informed Policy-Making: Are We Doing Enough? Comment on “Examining and Contextualizing Approaches to Establish Policy Support Organizations – A Mixed Method Study.” International Journal of Health Policy and Management. Kerman University of Medical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.34172/IJHPM.2022.7010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free