Deregulation despite transitional gains: The brewers guild of Cologne 1461

17Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Acemoglu and Robinson (in The American Economic Review 90(2):126-130, 2000) argue that historically economic rents have been less of a barrier to regulatory reform and innovation than political rents. Contrary to this conclusion, I argue that the important margin of distinction for factors preventing deregulation is not whether rents are economic or political, but rather what alternative profit opportunities are available and how innovation has changed the entrepreneurial opportunity set. Using the example of medieval Cologne, I show that the transitional gains trap framework, as developed by Tullock (in The Bell Journal of Economics 6(2):671-678, 1975), applies in a static environment and can successfully prevent reform over long periods of time, but that neither political nor economic entrepreneurs will ignore an opportunity for increased profitability in the long run. In addition, the organization of the political unit to which the regulation applies can determine the persistence of said regulation. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thomas, D. W. (2009). Deregulation despite transitional gains: The brewers guild of Cologne 1461. Public Choice, 140(3–4), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9420-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free