From evidence to understanding: A precarious path

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Falsifiability is the cornerstone of science. However, Rutherford notwithstanding, almost by definition science functions at the limits of measurement accuracy and theoretical grasp, so that statistical analysis is central to scientific advance. This applies as much to physics as it does to psychology, as much to geology as to biology. I look at some of the potholes in the path of scientific discovery, showing how easy it is to stumble, and at some of the consequences for the scientific endeavour. © 2013 Academia Europæa.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hand, D. J. (2013). From evidence to understanding: A precarious path. European Review, 21(SUPPL. 1). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798713000112

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free