Not all DTC patients with N positive disease deserve the attribution "high risk". Contribution of the MSDS trial

23Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and Objectives To investigate if patients with thyroid carcinoma having N1a disease are at the same risk with N1b using the collective of the well-defined European prospective Multicentre Study Differentiated Thyroid Cancer (MSDS). Methods Overall (OS) and event free survival (EFS) were calculated. Cox multivariable regression analysis was performed in order to calculate Hazard ratios (HR). Results EFS was significantly decreased only in patients with N1b metastasis as compared to N0 patients and became worse when N1a was concomitantly affected. A superior survival in favor of N1a patients as compared to N1b patients with regard to EFS was also observed. The patients having N1a disease showed no differences in the EFS as compared to N0. OS did not differ significantly in any of the groups. There was an increased HR for events with regards to histology, T-stage, tumor size, UICC stage and cervical lymph node metastasis. Tumor size showed a significantly increased risk for OS. Conclusions Patients with pT3b and pT4a tumors with N1b are of higher risk for relapse, albeit not affecting overall survival. Patients with N1a are of no higher risk. The risk stratification of these patients may be adapted accordingly. J. Surg. Oncol. 2015 111:9-14.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vrachimis, A., Wenning, C., Gerß, J., Dralle, H., Vaez Tabassi, M., Schober, O., & Riemann, B. (2015). Not all DTC patients with N positive disease deserve the attribution “high risk”. Contribution of the MSDS trial. Journal of Surgical Oncology, 112(1), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23948

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free