Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of neutrophil proliferation induced by recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF): Comparison between intravenous and subcutaneous administration

12Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Pharmacological effect after intravenous (i.v.) or subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of human recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) was evaluated by using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model. The increase of neutrophil counts in blood after s.c. administration of rhG-CSF (0.5-1.Oμg/kg) was larger than that after i.v. administration of the same dose, while area under the curves of plasma concentration of rhG-CSF after s.c. administration was smaller than that after i.v. administration (Azuma et al., J. Clin. Therap. Med., 5, 1579- 1603, 1989). Based on the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model considering metabolic turnover of neutrophil in vivo, time course of absolute neutrophil counts in blood after either type of rhG-CSF administration to normal healthy volunteers was analyzed. The nonlinear relationship between the concentration of rhG-CSF and in vitro activity for proliferation of neutrophil could be explained by the drug-receptor-effector ternary complex model. These in vivo and in vitro models made it possible to understand the above-mentioned discrepancy of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic behavior between i.v. and s.c. administration of rhG-CSF. Simulation of the neutrophil count-time profiles after repeated i.v. and s.c. dosing of rhG-CSF according to these models showed good agreement with the observed data. In order to obtain the rational dosage regimen of rhG-CSF from pharmacological and economical points of view, a slow constant infusion method may be more useful than rapid infusion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sugiura, M., Yamamoto, K., Sawada, Y., & Iga, T. (1997). Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of neutrophil proliferation induced by recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF): Comparison between intravenous and subcutaneous administration. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 20(6), 684–689. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.20.684

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free