Abstract
We provide empirical evidence that a positive shock to technology drives up per capita hours worked, consumption, investment, average productivity and output . This evidence contrasts sharply with the results reported in a large and growing literature that argues, on the basis of aggregate data, that per capita hours worked fall after a positive technology shock. We argue that the difference in results primarily reflects specification error in the way that the literature models the low-frequency component of hours worked.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Christiano, L. J., Eichenbaum, M. S., & Vigfusson, R. J. (2003). What Happens After A Technology Shock? International Finance Discussion Papers, 2003.0(768), 1–54. https://doi.org/10.17016/ifdp.2003.768
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.