Hot Off the Press: Chemical Versus Electrical Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation

0Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a significant dysrhythmia that often requires treatment in the emergency department (ED). This can be performed with rhythm control using electrical or chemical cardioversion or with rate control. There is widespread variation in management of AF within Canada and worldwide. This study focuses on rhythm control techniques, comparing ED length of stay when using an electrical-first strategy versus a chemical-first strategy of cardioversion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bond, C., Morgenstern, J., Heitz, C., & Milne, W. K. (2020). Hot Off the Press: Chemical Versus Electrical Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation. Academic Emergency Medicine, 27(4), 333–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13874

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free