The diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury: Current diagnostic ability and future challenges of the digestive disease week-japan 2004 scale 15 years after its proposal

5Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective This study examined whether or not the Digestive Disease Week-Japan (DDW-J) 2004 scale proposed over 15 years ago can be applied to current cases of drug-induced liver injury (DILI). Methods The new patients group included 125 patients from 2012 to 2019 and was divided into 2 subgroups: 96 patients in the new DILI group and 29 patients in the new non-DILI group. Similarly, the old patients group included 105 patients from 1997 to 2002 and was divided into 2 subgroups: 59 patients in the old DILI group and 46 patients in the old non-DILI group. Patients were assessed by the DDW-J 2004 scale; those with a score _3 were defined as having DILI. Results The total score of the new DILI group was significantly lower than that of the old DILI group [6 (1-11) vs. 6 (3-9), p=0.004]. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV) were 94.8%, 65.6%, 90.1%, and 79.2%, respectively, in the new patients group and 100%, 91.4%, 93.7%, and 100%, respectively, in the old patients group. The specificity and NPV of the new patients group were significantly lower than those of the old patients group. Conclusion The DDW-J 2004 scale maintains a stable diagnostic ability for DILI, regardless of differences in eras and verification methods. However, differential diagnoses can affect the scoring, and new types of DILI, such as immune-related adverse events, must be addressed. Therefore, upgrading the scale should be considered.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Watanabe, M., Shibuya, A., Yokomori, H., & Koizumi, W. (2021). The diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury: Current diagnostic ability and future challenges of the digestive disease week-japan 2004 scale 15 years after its proposal. Internal Medicine, 60(16), 2557–2568. https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.6370-20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free