Is mainstreaming always the answer? The social and economic development of service user communities

6Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The community placement of people with serious mental illness has focused on assimilation. The broad community, however, seems largely unwilling to support and include them. The result is programmes to help people maintain their community lives mainly through the support of formal mental health services. The social and economic development of 'identity communities' of people with serious mental illness is an alternative model to assimilation. An identity community consists of people with shared interests, beliefs, experiences or needs which affect the identity of the participants and the cohesiveness of the group. Such communities can be economically sustainable and offer members more ways of having meaningful lives. Examples of this recovery-friendly approach are provided as a viable way of enhancing community support without additional expense.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mandiberg, J. M., & Warner, R. (2013, May). Is mainstreaming always the answer? The social and economic development of service user communities. Psychiatrist. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.112.040659

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free