Abstract
COVID-19 has resulted in broad impacts on the economy and aspects of daily life including our collective mental health and well-being. The Australian health care system already faces limitations in its ability to treat people with mental health diagnoses. Australia has responded to the COVID-19 outbreak by, among other initiatives, providing reimbursement for telehealth services. However, it is unclear if these measures will be enough to manage the psychological distress, depression, anxiety and post-traumatic distress shown to accompany infectious disease outbreaks and economic shocks. Decision making has focused on the physical health ramifications of COVID-19, the avoidance of over-burdening the health care system and saving lives. We propose an alternative framework for decision making that combines life years saved with impacts on quality of life. A framework that simultaneously includes mental health and broader economic impacts into a single decision-making process would facilitate transparent and accountable decision making that can improve the overall welfare of Australian society as we continue to address the considerable challenges that the COVID-19 pandemic is creating.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Mihalopoulos, C., Chatterton, M. L., Engel, L., Le, L. K. D., & Lee, Y. Y. (2020). Whither economic evaluation in the case of COVID-19: What can the field of mental health economics contribute within the Australian context? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 54(12), 1157–1161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867420963724
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.