Comparison of anterior and posterior mini-implant-Assisted maxillary incisor intrusion: Root resorption and treatment efficiency

34Citations
Citations of this article
124Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To compare, through cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), the root resorption and treatment efficiency of two different mini-implant-Assisted modalities in intruding the maxillary incisors. Materials and Methods: Thirty-Two adults who had deep bite and elongated maxillary incisors were randomly allocated to two groups: Anterior mini-implant group (AMG) and posterior miniimplant group (PMG). In the AMG, approximately 40 g of force was applied per side with elastic chains from mini-implants placed between the lateral incisors and canines and in the PMG, with beta-Titanium wires from mini-implants placed between the second premolars and first molars. This study was conducted on CBCT scans taken before intrusion and after 4 months of intrusion. Data were analyzed by means of a paired t-Test, independent t-Test, and Pearson's correlation test. Results: One patient was excluded from the AMG due to mini-implant loosening. While the incisors showed a significant reduction in length and volume, this amount was greater in the AMG, especially in the central incisors (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aras, I., & Tuncer, A. V. (2016). Comparison of anterior and posterior mini-implant-Assisted maxillary incisor intrusion: Root resorption and treatment efficiency. Angle Orthodontist, 86(5), 746–752. https://doi.org/10.2319/085015-571.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free