Consistency, Inter-rater Reliability, and Validity of 441 Consecutive Mock Oral Examinations in Anesthesiology

  • Schubert A
  • Tetzlaff J
  • Tan M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

441 vivas to 190 residents. Format as ASA board. Viva result compared with in-training measures and evaluations. Internal consistency between components 0.82; inter-examiner agreement 0.68. Agreement on pass-fail was higher at 84%. Not so good correlation with in-training measures. Viva result associated with length of training, viva preparation, and anxiety. Investigators happy that vivas are OK. Editorial comment: James FM III, ib. 4-6. Adds little. Makes the comment that the paper is not easy to read, with unfamiliar stats, and supports their conclusions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schubert, A., Tetzlaff, J. E., Tan, M., Ryckman, V. J., & Mascha, E. (1999). Consistency, Inter-rater Reliability, and Validity of 441 Consecutive Mock Oral Examinations in Anesthesiology. Anesthesiology, 91(1), 288–298. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199907000-00037

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free