Authenticity in Constructivist Inquiry: Assessing an Elusive Construct

  • Shannon P
  • Hambacher E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
96Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Methodological rigor in constructivist inquiry is established through an assessment of trustworthiness and authenticity. Trustworthiness parallels the positivistic concepts of internal and external validity, focusing on an assessment of the inquiry process. Authenticity, however, is unique to constructivist inquiry and has no parallel in the positivistic paradigm. Authenticity involves an assessment of the meaningfulness and usefulness of interactive inquiry processes and social change that results from these processes. However, the techniques for ascertaining authenticity are in the early stages of development. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to describe a process for assessing authenticity in a constructivist inquiry. A brief overview of constructivist inquiries are described in relation to a set of techniques designed specifically to assess five dimensions of authenticity. Implications for constructivist researchers and social work research are presented.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shannon, P., & Hambacher, E. (2015). Authenticity in Constructivist Inquiry: Assessing an Elusive Construct. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1418

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free