Intertidal colonization rates. A matched latitude, north v. south, remote v. near shore island experiment

9Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Colonization of artificial substrata was monitored on sheltered rocky shores at Husvik, South Georgia (54° 11′S; 36° 40′W) and Cumbrae, Scotland (55° 46′N; 4° 55′W) from mid summer to early autumn. South Georgia is a remote island (1,330km from other land); Cumbrae is only 2km from nearby coasts. Both islands were heavily glaciated for a period up to about 10,000ybp, so the intertidal fauna is of geologically recent origin. The South Georgian fauna is depauperate and consists mainly of direct developers; that of Cumbrae is rich and largely larviparous. Colonization rates at Cumbrae were one to four orders of magnitude greater than at Husvik. It is suggested that the fauna of South Georgian shores stems from colonization by rafting from remote sources, while Cumbrae has been supplied predominantly by short-range pelagic larval dispersal. The measured differences in colonization rates reflect the substantial local advantage of larval dispersal over direct development in established communities. © 1998 Blackwell Science Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Davenport, J., & Stevenson, T. D. I. (1998). Intertidal colonization rates. A matched latitude, north v. south, remote v. near shore island experiment. Diversity and Distributions, 4(2), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-4642.1998.00008.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free