Interdependence versus Truth and Justice: Lessons from Reconciliation Processes in Maluku

  • Kusumaningrum D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Truth commissions and trials have been applauded as the way to move on from a violent past. Yet, some post-conflict societies managed to move toward reconciliation without the presence, or the effective presence of such formal institutions. This article discusses a number of lessons learned from Maluku, where reconciliation took the interdependence path. Taking on an interpretive, emic approach, it elaborates on the sites and mechanisms of interpendence. It argues that interdependence can be as viable as truth and justice procedures in bringing about reconciliation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kusumaningrum, D. (2017). Interdependence versus Truth and Justice: Lessons from Reconciliation Processes in Maluku. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 20(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.17998

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free