Comparison of postoperative outcomes following multidetector computed tomography based vs transesophageal echocardiography based annulus sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis

5Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the difference in postoperative outcomes following multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-based annulus sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods: Electronic search of PubMed, Biomed Central, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases was conducted until August 15, 2019. We included all types of studies comparing MDCT-based annulus sizing with TEE-based annulus sizing and assessing paravalvular regurgitation (PVR). Data were summarized using the Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: A total of six studies were included. Pooled analysis of 431 participants in the MDCT group and 509 participants in the TEE group demonstrated that MDCT-based annulus sizing is associated with a significantly lower incidence of more than moderate PVR as compared to 2DTEE-based sizing (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.18-0.54, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tang, G., Lv, Q., & He, X. (2020). Comparison of postoperative outcomes following multidetector computed tomography based vs transesophageal echocardiography based annulus sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Echocardiography, 37(10), 1617–1626. https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.14684

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free