Does Language Matter? Identity-First Versus Person-First Language Use in Autism Research: A Response to Vivanti

365Citations
Citations of this article
473Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In response to Vivanti’s ‘Ask The Editor…’ paper [Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50(2), 691–693], we argue that the use of language in autism research has material consequences for autistic people including stigmatisation, dehumanisation, and violence. Further, that the debate in the use of person-first language versus identity-first language should centre first and foremost on the needs, autonomy, and rights of autistic people, so in to preserve their rights to self-determination. Lastly, we provide directions for future research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Botha, M., Hanlon, J., & Williams, G. L. (2023, February 1). Does Language Matter? Identity-First Versus Person-First Language Use in Autism Research: A Response to Vivanti. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04858-w

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free