Diversity and Inclusion in Unregulated mHealth Research: Addressing the Risks

9Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

mHealth devices and applications, with their wide accessibility and ease of use, have the potential to address persistent inequities in biomedical research participation. Yet, while mHealth technologies may facilitate more inclusive research participation, negative features of some unregulated use in research — misleading enrollment practices, the promotion of secondary mHealth applications, discriminatory profiling, and poorer quality feedback due to dependencies on biased data and algorithms — may threaten the trust and engagement of underrepresented individuals and communities. To maximize the participation of currently disenfranchised groups, those involved in unregulated mHealth research must become aware of potential risks, adopt targeted education policies, audit algorithms for hidden biases, and engage citizen scientists and other community members to identify and forestall possible harms.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Callier, S., & Fullerton, S. M. (2020). Diversity and Inclusion in Unregulated mHealth Research: Addressing the Risks. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 48(1_suppl), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110520917036

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free